A divorce can be very traumatic on many levels. In order to minimize the stress and make sure your divorce goes smoothly, it’s important to keep a few elements in mind. You want to make sure that you: copy all your important documents; get everything in writing; and keep a diary.
Copy All Your Important Documents
If you are even thinking about a divorce, you want to make a copy of every conceivable important document in your house. From birth certificates to marriage licenses to bills to bills of sale on cars, you want to make sure that you gain all the evidence you can to show who had what in whose name at what time.
Get Everything in Writing
You are constructing a case against another person. Therefore, any statements about how you agree upon certain elements of the divorce should be put down in writing so that they would stand up in a court of law if they were to be requested. For example, stating that your spouse said you could have the house might have been said–but oral agreements are difficult to prove in court. So, get agreements and other statements in writing. That way you will come out on top.
Keep a Diary
In order to ensure you have a smooth divorce, you have to show yourself to be a reliable person to the judge. If your spouse is a spendthrift who put you into financial ruin, put it down in your diary. If your spouse was abusive towards you or any dependents at any time, write it down. Diaries can be utilized as evidence in court, and have been in certain cases. Written evidence from your personal life could make or break your case in divorce court.
The big takeaway from this entire piece is, documentation is key. What matters is what you can prove in court. When building a case, you need to copy important documentation, get things in writing, and keep a diary. Consult an Alabama family law expert if applicable.
If you need help finding top-notch legal representation in Alabama, there are many tried and true ways to find one. Utilizing the ten reference points below will help you to find a great Alabama criminal lawyer or Alabama family law attorney.
1. Consult with acquaintances and ask whether they can recommend a lawyer. In doing so, however, you should avoid revealing any confidential information. Later, once you have retained a lawyer, your discussions with that lawyer are confidential and protected by the attorney client privilege.
2. Check with the Alabama Bar Association for referrals to lawyers who handle your type of case.
3. You can research online to find the qualifications of many lawyers. You should never retain a lawyer, however, before meeting the individual in person.
4. Once you have met a potential lawyer, ask yourself if this someone who you feel that you can work with successfully? You should only retain a lawyer with whom you are comfortable talking and discussing the facts of your case.
5. You should always discuss fee arrangements with your attorney. A good attorney will be happy to discuss compensation and expenses with you.
6. Choosing a great lawyer will typically mean finding someone with experience in your type of case. Ask your potential lawyer about the number of cases he has handled similar to yours.
7. You should also ask whether your lawyer has experience in the court where your case is likely to be filed. For example, some lawyers practice more in federal court than in state court. Is your attorney experienced in the venue in which your case will be prosecuted or filed?
8. Has your lawyer published or spoken to professional organizations on relevant topics? If so, read these materials to learn more about your lawyer’s expertise.
9. Where is your lawyer located? Finding a great local Alabama lawyer will be to your advantage.
10. Ask whether your lawyer handles both trials and appeals. Does he take cases to trial frequently?
Follow these guidelines, and you will find a great Alabama criminal lawyer or Alabama family law attorney.
If you are looking for an excellent Alabama criminal lawyer as well as one highly knowledgeable of Alabama family law in Centre, Alabama, you need not look any further than the very capable J. Shane Givens and his law firm. This law firm in Centre, Alabama specializes in providing its clients with the best legal advice and protection in the area. You can trust the staff, and you know that J. Shane Givens will take the time to listen to your issues and offer a solution that will not drain your wallet. If you need legal advice, you can be sure this local firm will keep your best interest a priority.
An attorney has no better calling card than his reputation with the community and the people he serves. J. Shane Givens is known for his prompt responses to his clients. You do not have to remain in a state of confusion and fear because you know he understands the turmoil that can result from having doubts surrounding legal issues. He also is dedicated to providing his services in a cost-effective manner. You no longer have to worry about the financial ramifications of seeking the advice of an attorney with J. Shane Givens.
When it comes to the law, J. Shane Givens is also one of the most knowledgeable attorneys in the area. Mr. Givens was trained at one of the largest law firms in Birmingham, Alabama, and he learned from that experience what it takes to make the process run smoothly for his clients. He understands that using technology allows him to steadily assess his client’s ever changing legal situation, and while monitoring these changes, he can provide solutions to his client while avoiding expensive litigation. J. Shane Givens will utilize all these techniques to help you with issues such as divorce, custody, adoption, palimony, and artificial conception. He also is highly skilled at providing help for people facing criminal charges.
Whether you need an expert in Alabama family law or an Alabama criminal lawyer, call J. Shane Givens, and set up a consultation today!
Life is unpredictable, and some of the best of us can find ourselves in the midst of a very bad situation. If you are charged with a crime, you will need an excellent attorney to provide a strong defense for you. In every society, there has to be punishment for certain behavior that is harmful to citizens and the entire society. Behavior that fits in these categories is labeled a crime; the perpetrator or person convicted of the crime can face imprisonment and/or fines.
Every state has laws and regulations specific to that state, so it is important to find an Alabama criminal lawyer that is experienced in Alabama criminal law.
When you hire a lawyer, you should be confident in their ability to protect your legal rights. Fortunately, our justice system provides every citizen with rights, and a person is presumed innocent until found guilty. If you don’t have an attorney who knows the law, you can quickly find yourself in prison. It is your right to have an Alabama criminal lawyer that will provide an aggressive defense.
Although some of us will have to fight criminal charges, the majority of people will have a family issue that will require legal action. Family law is filled with emotion, and family law cases are highly time-sensitive. Consequently, if you live in the state of Alabama, you will need an Alabama family law professional that is experienced with family legal issues. Family court handles these legal matters. Divorce, child custody, adoption, child support, and visitation are all family law matters that need an Alabama family law specialist to provide you with the best legal protection possible.
Too many people are denied their legal rights because they did not have competent representation. This will significantly change your life; you can’t afford to let criminal charges or family law issues hang in the balance. These issues will not go away, and you must give yourself a fighting chance. An experienced Alabama attorney can protect your rights and fight for you.
The courts view domestic violence (DV) seriously in the state of Alabama. The law categorizes this crime into Class A, B or C felonies and misdemeanors, depending on the type and severity of the crime and the types of injuries the victim sustained. Domestic violence means a crime committed against a current or former household member or significant other, including a dating partner.
First degree DV includes, but is not limited to, the most serious types of assault, kidnapping, murder and rape. Class A felonies mean a time in custody ranging from 10 to 99 years and a maximum fine of $60,000. Second degree DV includes, but is not limited to, certain types of assault, manslaughter, kidnapping and rape. Class B felonies carry a possible prison term of two to 20 years with a maximum fine of $10,000. Third degree DV includes, but is not limited to, threats, endangerment and harassment and is considered a Class C felony. Class C felonies carry a possible sentence of between two and 20 years with a maximum $5,000 fine. The presence of a weapon enhances the prison time associated with any of these charges.
Police can also immediately arrest anyone who violates an order of protection; this crime is a Class A misdemeanor. If the defendant is thought to be a danger to the victim, the police can arrest the offender without a warrant.
At the defendant’s initial appearance, the judge will consider the level of threat the defendant poses to the victim and if the defendant is a threat to the community. The judge will also consider if the defendant will appear for court hearings when setting bail and release conditions.
A law enforcement officer must consider the truthfulness of statements related to the double filing of DV accusations. These include previous complaints or arrests, the types of injuries, the potential for future injuries and actions of self-defense.
Anyone accused of domestic violence should immediately contact a reputable Alabama criminal lawyer. Someone with additional experience in Alabama family law will work with clients to ensure their rights are protected in court.
“Obamacare” is the informal name for The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), a United States federal statute signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010. The law (along with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010) is the principal health care reform legislation of President Obama’s administration.
The PPACA basically requires adults not covered by insurance plans to maintain health insurance coverage or pay a penalty. The Act also affects certain aspects of the private health insurance industry and public health insurance programs, requires insurance coverage of pre-existing conditions, and seeks to extend coverage to 30 million uninsured Americans. The Obama administration projects the Act will both lower future deficits and Medicare spending.
The PPACA is a Democratic-based Act. The vast majority of Republicans are strongly opposed to the law, as you have probably seen on T.V. The Act passed the Senate on December 24, 2009 by a vote of 60–39 with all Democrats and two Independents voting ion favor of the bill and all but one Republican voting against it. It passed the House of Representatives on March 21, 2010, by a vote of 219–212, with 34 Democrats and all 178 Republicans voting against the bill.
A majority of the states (including Alabama) and numerous organizations and individuals, filed actions in federal court challenging the constitutionality of the PPACA. On June 28, 2012, in the case of National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, the Supreme Court upheld the majority of the law.
The PPACA includes numerous provisions to take effect from 2010 to 2020. Some of the major things the PPACA requires including the following:
- Insurance companies will be required to offer the same premium to all applicants of the same age and geographical location without regard to most pre-existing conditions (excluding tobacco use).
- All persons not covered by insurance from their employer, Medicaid, Medicare or other public insurance programs, must purchase an approved private insurance policy or pay a penalty.
- Medicaid eligibility is increased to include more people.
- Low income persons and families not eligible for Medicaid will receive federal support to purchase insurance.
- Minimum standards for health insurance policies are to be established and annual and lifetime coverage caps will be banned.
- Firms employing 50 or more people not offering health insurance will have to contribute to their employees insurance in many cases.
- Small businesses will receive federal benefits in many cases where they provide insurance for employees.
- Co-payments, co-insurance, and deductibles are to be eliminated for health care insurance benefits considered to be part of an “essential benefits package.”
Traditionally republican states like Alabama and others, however, are opposed to the PPACA and have made is clear that they will not impose the new law. Next week we will take a look at why Alabama is opposed to this health care reform and what it means for the State to refuse to cooperate with the federal government in following the PPACA.
As we all probably know, Roger Clemens has been back in the news following his recent acquittal. As you will remember, a federal grand jury indicted Clemens on August 19, 2010 on charges of making false statements to Congress about his use of steroids. The indictment charged Clemens with one count of “contempt of Congress,” three counts of “making false statements” and two counts of “perjury” in connection with his February 2008 testimony to Congress.
Clemens’ first trial began on July 13, 2011, but on the second day of testimony the judge in the case declared a mistrial after prosecutors showed the jury evidence they had previously been told by the judge not to show. The verdict from his second trial came in on June 18, 2012. Clemens was found not guilty of all charges. When all this hit the news again, a friend of mine asked, “What exactly was Roger Clemens charged with?”
Most reporters are incorrectly stating that Clemens was found innocent of six counts of perjury when, in reality, he only had two counts of perjury. The first crime listed on his indictment was for “contempt of congress.” Contempt of congress is the act of obstructing the work of the United States Congress or one of its committees. Historically the bribery of a senator or representative was considered contempt of Congress. In modern times, contempt of Congress has generally applied to the refusal to comply with a subpoena issued by a Congressional committee — usually served on someone to force them to testify or produce documents.
For example, if a person receives a subpoena from Congress, and refuses to fully carry out what the subpoena orders, congress can issue a “contempt citation.” The presiding officer of the chamber is then instructed to refer the matter to the U.S. Attorney. It is then the duty of the U.S. Attorney to refer the matter to a federal grand jury for potential prosecution. The punishment for contempt of Congress includes a jail penalty is not less than one month or more than twelve months, with a potential fine.
Clemens other charges were “perjury” and “making false statements.” Perjury is the willful act of lying while under oath concerning matters material to a judicial proceeding. Therefore, the lie must be made under oath at a hearing and must affect the outcome of the hearing. For example, if a sworn witness lies about his age in court, this lie is only considered to be perjury if the man’s age affects the outcome of the case. Perjury carries a prison sentence of up to 5 years.
“Making false statements” prohibits lying to a federal officer or concealing information from a federal officer. Essentially, a “making false statements” charge is the same as a “perjury” charge without the requirement that you be under oath. To prove a “making false statements” charge, the government must show that the witness lied to a federal officer in order to “undermine functions of governmental departments and agencies.” This crime carries a fine and a prison sentence of up to 5 years, just like perjury.
After explaining all this, my friend then asked, “Why did the government spend so much time and money on THAT?” This may be the best question of all!
George Zimmerman has become a famous (or infamous) name recently. Most people have heard about Zimmerman, who was charged with killing Trayvon Martin a few months ago. Anyone who has been closely following the case also knows that Zimmerman was released from custody on a $150,000.00 bond in April of this year. A few days ago, however, Zimmerman’s bond was revoked. This bond revocation has caused one reader to question how and why Zimmerman could be ordered to return to jail after being released.
Under Alabama laws of criminal procedure, with very limited exceptions, a person has a right to be released on bond while awaiting his trial. In its simplest form, bond (or bail) requires either money or property be placed in control of the court as assurance that the defendant will show up for court appearances related to his case. If the defendant fails to appear, the court can declare the money or property “forfeited” and issue a warrant for the immediate arrest of the defendant.
As a condition of bond, the defendant must at least (1) appear to answer and submit to the orders of the court; (2) refrain from committing any new criminal offense; (3) not depart from the State without permission from the Court; and (4) immediately notify the court of any change of address. The court can also place other requirements on the defendant, such as submit to random drug testing, make payments into the court for any future costs or fines, etc.
Alabama criminal procedure sets up “recommended ranges” for bond amounts, which vary depending on the type of charge. For example, for a class C felony the recommended range is $2,500 to $15,000; for a class B felony $5,000 to 30,000; for a class A felony $10,000 to $60,000; $15,000 to $75,000 for murder; $5,000 to $1,500,000 for drug trafficking, and so on. The amounts can be adjusted up or down based on several factors including: the severity of the crime, the risk of the defendant fleeing, the criminal history of the defendant, and the ability of the defendant to actually pay the bond.
During Zimmerman’s bond hearing, Zimmerman’s wife testified that she had no money to post bond for her husband. Considering the Zimmerman’s financial status, and the severity of the crime, the court set Zimmerman’s bond at $150,000, which some people considered to be low. Zimmerman’s family posted the bond and he was freed.
Later, however, prosecutor Bernardo de la Rionda discovered that the Zimmerman’s had raised over $135,000 from the public which was not disclosed to the court at the bond hearing. Bernardo de la Rionda called Ms. Zimmerman’s testimony about her financial condition “a blatant lie.” The judge, obviously upset about Ms. Zimmerman’s untruthful testimony, ordered Mr. Zimmerman to return to jail.
This is a perfect example of probably one of the most important rules to remember in a bond hearing (or any other court proceeding) – never lie to the judge. Lying to the court is almost always justifiable grounds for the court to change its mind on a ruling. In this case, it may mean that Zimmerman has to remain in jail while awaiting trial, even though he didn’t violate any of the “standard terms” of his release. Additionally, it makes others question his credibility, which will always be an issue at trial.
Recently, the Cherokee County Commission passed certain sewage ordinances for areas within the Alabama Power Flood easement around Weiss Lake due to take effect July 9, 2012. These laws not only provide guidelines for sewage disposal, but also give the Cherokee County Health Department the ability to create rules and regulations regarding sewage disposal inside the flood easement.
The Health Department’s “Sewage Regulations” are set to take effect July 9, 2012 and mainly focus on “holding tank” regulations as well as hook-up requirements to “sanitary sewage systems” within the Weiss Lake flood easement.
A “holding tank” is defined as “a water-tight receptacle for the collection and temporary retention of sewage . . . designed and constructed to facilitate removal and ultimate disposal at another site.” “Holding tanks” do not include sewage collection tanks on board a recreational vehicle or travel trailer. A “sanitary sewer system” is defined as a properly permitted public or private sewer system, including “decentralized” systems like a cluster wastewater system or community wastewater system.
According to these rules, anyone wanting to use a holding tank for sewage disposal must first obtain a permit from the Cherokee County Health Department. Application for such a permit is made by submitting an application form provided by the Health Department. Holding tanks will not be permitted, however, if there is an available connection to a sanitary sewer system, or if a sanitary sewer system becomes available. In other words, once an approved sanitary sewage system becomes available, you must hook onto it.
A permit for an existing or new temporary holding tank requires you to be contracted with a licensed sewage pumper for periodic pumping. Reports of holding tank pumping must be submitted to the Health Department as specified in the holding tank permit or as otherwise required by the Health Department.
Although you can get a permit for holding tanks installed and used prior to July 9, 2012, you must prove to the Health Department that the holding tank was intended by the manufacturer to be used for sewage storage or that the existing holding tank has been inspected and certified in writing to be structurally sound and suitable for sewage storage by a professional Alabama licensed engineer. Holding tanks installed on or after July 9, 2012 must also be certified and have a minimum capacity of 1,000 gallons per day or be 25% larger than the projected sewage flow accumulation between scheduled pumping, whichever is larger.
The amount of the fee for a holding tank permit shall be designated in accordance with Alabama law, but shall not exceed $150.00 unless approved by the Cherokee County Commission.
Clients and people in the community will often ask me to explain the difference between and “grand jury” and a “regular jury.” Many people (like myself, before I became a lawyer) have no idea what the purpose is behind a “grand jury.” In the United States, the grand jury was formally established through the creation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. At its roots, the grand jury is supposed to function like a group of “neighbors” to help the state and society by bringing criminals to justice, while at the same time, protecting the innocent from unjust accusations.
In the federal system, the grand jury decides whether someone should be formally charged (or “indicted”) for a serious crime. The grand jury may only evaluate evidence presented by the prosecutor—a specialized attorney of the United States government. Most states, like Alabama, use the same federal grand jury system to indict, or being formal charges against criminal defendants.
A grand jury is a group of citizens, typically chosen from the same pool as trial jurors. Members of a grand jury are sworn by a court to hear evidence presented by the prosecutor regarding a case. A grand jury is always composed of no less than 12 and no more than 23 people; in a federal court, the number is no less than 16 and no more than 23.
Unlike a trial jury — which determines whether a criminal defendant is innocent or guilty by unanimous vote — a grand jury can indict a defendant with a majority vote. Again, only the trial jury will decide whether a defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime in question; however, a grand jury will listen to evidence and decide if a suspect should be charged with a crime. As a result, the grand jury is only responsible for determining whether the State has probable cause to bring a charge against a person.
Because the grand jury’s primary responsibility is to determine probable cause, it will not hear all the evidence or conflicting arguments associated with the case. The information provided to the grand jury is delivered by the prosecutor. In fact, the suspect’s lawyer is not allowed to be present during presentation to the grand jury, and is not really even allowed to know when the grand jury convenes. Although suspects themselves can testify in front of the grand jury, the State is under no obligation to notify the suspect that his case is being presented.
A grand jury will use the power of the court system to command (through the issuance of a subpoena) the delivery of evidence. Further, the grand jury may invite witnesses to provide testimony, although this rarely happens. There is no judge present during grand jury proceedings during the exchange of evidence and information. In fact, the entire grand jury proceedings are overseen by the prosecution. Once the grand jury has made their decision, they will either issue a “true bill,” meaning that the state had probable cause to charge the suspect, or a “no bill” which in effect dismisses the action for lack of probable cause.